Skip to main content

HB 943

AN ACT relating to informed consent before the provision of certain

House Bill
Filed

Filed

Bill introduced by legislator

Committee

Hearing

Passed Cmte

Calendar

Passed

Sent

Enrolled

Governor

Signed

89th Regular Session

Jan 14, 2025 - Jun 2, 2025 • Session ended

Awaiting Committee Assignment

Bill filed, pending referral to House committee

← Back to Bills

Committee

Not yet assigned

Fiscal Note

Not available

What This Bill Does

relating to informed consent before the provision of certain

Bill Text

relating to informed consent before the provision of certain
medical treatments involving COVID-19 vaccination.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
SECTION 1.  This Act shall be known as the Texas COVID-19
SECTION 2.  The legislature finds that:
(1)  this state is responsible for ensuring that
individuals lawfully residing in this state have the right to
provide or withhold consent for any medical treatment;
(2)  the decision in Canterbury v. Spence, 464 F.2d 772
(D.C. Cir. 1972), establishing the concept of informed consent, has
become a bedrock principle of the laws of this country and of each
(3)  the American Medical Association's Code of Medical
Ethics Opinion 2.1.1 recognizes an individual's right to be fully
informed of a recommended medical treatment to allow the individual
to make an informed decision regarding the individual's course of
treatment, including whether to obtain or decline a particular
(4)  under 42 C.F.R. Section 482.13, a hospital is
required as a condition of participation in Medicare to have in
place a process for obtaining a patient's informed consent before
providing treatment to the patient and to ensure "[t]he patient or
his or her representative (as allowed under State law) has the right
to make informed decisions regarding his or her care";
(5)  the United States Supreme Court upheld mandatory
vaccination policies imposed by state and local governments to
combat smallpox in Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905),
and acknowledged in PruneYard Shopping Center v. Robins, 447 U.S.
74, 81 (1980), that a state may provide "individual liberties more
expansive than those conferred by the Federal Constitution";
(6)  persons inside and outside this state have sought
or are seeking to compel or coerce individuals lawfully residing in
this state into being vaccinated against COVID-19 contrary to the
(7)  any attempt to compel or coerce an individual
lawfully residing in this state into being vaccinated against
COVID-19 contrary to the individual's preference is inconsistent
with the principles of informed consent; and
(8)  Section 161.0086, Health and Safety Code, as added
by this Act, prohibits any person from compelling or coercing an
individual lawfully residing in this state into obtaining medical
treatments involving the administration of a COVID-19 vaccine.
SECTION 3.  Subchapter A, Chapter 161, Health and Safety
Code, is amended by adding Section 161.0086 to read as follows:
Sec. 161.0086.  INFORMED CONSENT REQUIRED FOR MEDICAL
TREATMENTS INVOLVING COVID-19 VACCINATION.  (a)  In this section:
(1)  "COVID-19" means the 2019 novel coronavirus
(2)  "Health care provider" means an individual
licensed or otherwise authorized by this state to administer
(b)  A person may not compel or coerce an individual lawfully
residing in this state into obtaining a medical treatment involving
the administration of a COVID-19 vaccine, including a COVID-19
vaccine approved or authorized by the United States Food and Drug
Administration, contrary to the individual's vaccination
(c)  A health care provider may not provide to an individual
lawfully residing in this state a medical treatment involving the
administration of a COVID-19 vaccine, including a COVID-19 vaccine
approved or authorized by the United States Food and Drug
Administration, unless the provider obtains the individual's
informed consent before administering the COVID-19 vaccine.
(d)  For purposes of this section, an individual lacks the
capacity to provide informed consent for a medical treatment
involving the administration of a COVID-19 vaccine if the
individual has been compelled or coerced into being vaccinated
against COVID-19 contrary to the individual's vaccination
(e)  A person may not take an adverse action or impose a
penalty of any kind against an individual lawfully residing in this
state for the individual's refusal or failure to obtain a medical
treatment involving the administration of a COVID-19 vaccine.
(f)  The attorney general may bring an action for injunctive
relief against a person to prevent the person from violating this
section.  In an injunction issued under this subsection, a court may
include reasonable requirements to prevent further violations of
(g)  A health care provider who violates Subsection (c) is
liable to the individual who is the subject of the violation for
damages in an amount of not less than $5,000.  In an action brought
under this subsection, a claimant may recover reasonable expenses
incurred in bringing the action, including court costs, reasonable
attorney's fees, investigation costs, witness fees, and deposition
SECTION 4.  Section 161.0086, Health and Safety Code, as
added by this Act, applies only to conduct that occurs on or after
the effective date of this Act.
SECTION 5.  If any provision of this Act or its application
to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity does
not affect other provisions or applications of this Act that can be
given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to
this end the provisions of this Act are declared severable.
SECTION 6.  This Act takes effect immediately if it receives
a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as
provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution.  If this
Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this
Act takes effect September 1, 2025.

Bill History

filed

Bill filed: AN ACT relating to informed consent before the provision of certain