HB 2864
AN ACT relating to applying an active efforts standard for the removal of
89th Regular Session
Jan 14, 2025 - Jun 2, 2025 • Session ended
Awaiting Committee Assignment
Bill filed, pending referral to House committee
Committee
Not yet assigned
Fiscal Note
Not available
What This Bill Does
Modifies Texas Family Code provisions related to child protective services, focusing on changing the standard of "reasonable efforts" to "active efforts" when removing children from parents. It requires the Department of Family and Protective Services to use more comprehensive, thorough, and tailored approaches when working with families, including conducting comprehensive family assessments, identifying appropriate services, supporting family visits, and providing post-reunification services. The bill outlines specific criteria for terminating parental rights and establishes more detailed requirements for how child protective services must work to keep families together or safely reunite children with parents.
Subject Areas
Bill Text
relating to applying an active efforts standard for the removal of certain children in the managing conservatorship of the Department of Family and Protective Services. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: SECTION 1. Sections 161.001(a), (b), (f), and (g), Family Code, are amended to read as follows: (1) "Active efforts" has the meaning described by (2) "Born[, "born] addicted to alcohol or a controlled (A) [(1)] who is born to a mother who during the pregnancy used a controlled substance, as defined by Chapter 481, Health and Safety Code, other than a controlled substance legally obtained by prescription, or alcohol; and (B) [(2)] who, after birth as a result of the mother's use of the controlled substance or alcohol: (i) [(A)] experiences observable withdrawal from the alcohol or controlled substance; (ii) [(B)] exhibits observable or harmful effects in the child's physical appearance or functioning; or (iii) [(C)] exhibits the demonstrable presence of alcohol or a controlled substance in the child's bodily (b) The court may order termination of the parent-child relationship if the court finds by clear and convincing evidence: (A) voluntarily left the child alone or in the possession of another not the parent and expressed an intent not to (B) voluntarily left the child alone or in the possession of another not the parent without expressing an intent to return, without providing for the adequate support of the child, and remained away for a period of at least three months; (C) voluntarily left the child alone or in the possession of another without providing adequate support of the child and remained away for a period of at least six months; (D) knowingly placed or knowingly allowed the child to remain in conditions or surroundings which endanger the physical or emotional well-being of the child; (E) engaged in conduct or knowingly placed the child with persons who engaged in conduct which endangers the physical or emotional well-being of the child; (F) failed to support the child in accordance with the parent's ability during a period of one year ending within six months of the date of the filing of the petition; (G) abandoned the child without identifying the child or furnishing means of identification, and the child's identity cannot be ascertained by the exercise of reasonable (H) voluntarily, and with knowledge of the pregnancy, abandoned the mother of the child beginning at a time during her pregnancy with the child and continuing through the birth, failed to provide adequate support or medical care for the mother during the period of abandonment before the birth of the child, and remained apart from the child or failed to support the (I) contumaciously refused to submit to a reasonable and lawful order of a court under Subchapter D, Chapter (i) the failure of the child to be enrolled in school as required by the Education Code; or (ii) the child's absence from the child's home without the consent of the parents or guardian for a substantial length of time or without the intent to return; (K) executed before or after the suit is filed an unrevoked or irrevocable affidavit of relinquishment of parental rights as provided by this chapter; (L) been convicted or has been placed on community supervision, including deferred adjudication community supervision, for being criminally responsible for the death or serious injury of a child under the following sections of the Penal Code, or under a law of another jurisdiction that contains elements that are substantially similar to the elements of an offense under one of the following Penal Code sections, or adjudicated under Title 3 for conduct that caused the death or serious injury of a child and that would constitute a violation of one of the following (ii) Section 19.03 (capital murder); (iii) Section 19.04 (manslaughter); (iv) Section 21.11 (indecency with a (vi) Section 22.011 (sexual assault); (vii) Section 22.02 (aggravated assault); (viii) Section 22.021 (aggravated sexual (ix) Section 22.04 (injury to a child, elderly individual, or disabled individual); (x) Section 22.041 (abandoning or endangering a child, elderly individual, or disabled individual); (xi) Section 25.02 (prohibited sexual (xii) Section 43.25 (sexual performance by (xiii) Section 43.26 (possession or promotion of child pornography); (xiv) Section 21.02 (continuous sexual abuse of young child or disabled individual); (xv) Section 20A.02(a)(7) or (8) (xvi) Section 43.05(a)(2) (compelling (M) had his or her parent-child relationship terminated with respect to another child based on a finding that the parent's conduct was in violation of Paragraph (D) or (E) or substantially equivalent provisions of the law of another state; (N) constructively abandoned the child who has been in the permanent or temporary managing conservatorship of the Department of Family and Protective Services for not less than six (i) the department has made active [reasonable] efforts to return the child to the parent; (ii) the parent has not regularly visited or maintained significant contact with the child; and (iii) the parent has demonstrated an inability to provide the child with a safe environment; (O) failed to comply with the provisions of a court order that specifically established the actions necessary for the parent to obtain the return of the child who has been in the permanent or temporary managing conservatorship of the Department of Family and Protective Services for not less than nine months as a result of the child's removal from the parent under Chapter 262 for the abuse or neglect of the child; (P) used a controlled substance, as defined by Chapter 481, Health and Safety Code, in a manner that endangered the health or safety of the child, and: (i) failed to complete a court-ordered substance abuse treatment program; or (ii) after completion of a court-ordered substance abuse treatment program, continued to abuse a controlled (Q) knowingly engaged in criminal conduct that (i) conviction of an offense; and (ii) confinement or imprisonment and inability to care for the child for not less than two years from the (R) been the cause of the child being born addicted to alcohol or a controlled substance, other than a controlled substance legally obtained by prescription; (S) voluntarily delivered the child to a designated emergency infant care provider under Section 262.302 without expressing an intent to return for the child; (i) the murder of the other parent of the child under Section 19.02 or 19.03, Penal Code, or under a law of another state, federal law, the law of a foreign country, or the Uniform Code of Military Justice that contains elements that are substantially similar to the elements of an offense under Section (ii) criminal attempt under Section 15.01, Penal Code, or under a law of another state, federal law, the law of a foreign country, or the Uniform Code of Military Justice that contains elements that are substantially similar to the elements of an offense under Section 15.01, Penal Code, to commit the offense (iii) criminal solicitation under Section 15.03, Penal Code, or under a law of another state, federal law, the law of a foreign country, or the Uniform Code of Military Justice that contains elements that are substantially similar to the elements of an offense under Section 15.03, Penal Code, of the offense described by Subparagraph (i); or (iv) the sexual assault of the other parent of the child under Section 22.011 or 22.021, Penal Code, or under a law of another state, federal law, or the Uniform Code of Military Justice that contains elements that are substantially similar to the elements of an offense under Section 22.011 or 22.021, Penal (U) been placed on community supervision, including deferred adjudication community supervision, or another functionally equivalent form of community supervision or probation, for being criminally responsible for the sexual assault of the other parent of the child under Section 22.011 or 22.021, Penal Code, or under a law of another state, federal law, or the Uniform Code of Military Justice that contains elements that are substantially similar to the elements of an offense under Section 22.011 or 22.021, Penal Code; or (i) criminal solicitation of a minor under Section 15.031, Penal Code, or under a law of another state, federal law, the law of a foreign country, or the Uniform Code of Military Justice that contains elements that are substantially similar to the elements of an offense under Section 15.031, Penal Code; or (ii) online solicitation of a minor under Section 33.021, Penal Code, or under a law of another state, federal law, the law of a foreign country, or the Uniform Code of Military Justice that contains elements that are substantially similar to the elements of an offense under Section 33.021, Penal Code; and (2) that termination is in the best interest of the (f) In a suit for termination of the parent-child relationship filed by the Department of Family and Protective Services, the court may not order termination of the parent-child relationship under Subsection (b)(1) unless the court finds by clear and convincing evidence and describes in writing with specificity in a separate section of the order that: (1) the department made active [reasonable] efforts to return the child to the parent before commencement of a trial on the merits and despite those active [reasonable] efforts, a continuing danger remains in the home that prevents the return of the child to (2) active [reasonable] efforts to return the child to the parent, including the requirement for the department to provide a family service plan to the parent, have been waived under Section (g) In a suit for termination of the parent-child relationship filed by the Department of Family and Protective Services in which the department made active [reasonable] efforts to return the child to the child's home but a continuing danger in the home prevented the child's return, the court shall include in a separate section of its order written findings describing with specificity the active [reasonable] efforts the department made to return the child to the child's home. SECTION 2. Section 161.003, Family Code, is amended by amending Subsection (a) and adding Subsection (a-1) to read as (a) The court may order termination of the parent-child relationship in a suit filed by the Department of Family and Protective Services if the court finds that: (1) the parent has a mental or emotional illness or a mental deficiency that renders the parent unable to provide for the physical, emotional, and mental needs of the child; (2) the illness or deficiency, in all reasonable probability, proved by clear and convincing evidence, will continue to render the parent unable to provide for the child's needs until the 18th birthday of the child; (3) the department has been the temporary or sole managing conservator of the child of the parent for at least six months preceding the date of the hearing on the termination held in accordance with Subsection (c); (4) the department has made active [reasonable] efforts to return the child to the parent; and (5) the termination is in the best interest of the (a-1) In this section, "active efforts" has the meaning SECTION 3. Subchapter A, Chapter 262, Family Code, is amended by adding Section 262.0001 to read as follows: Sec. 262.0001. DEFINITION; ACTIVE EFFORTS. (a) In this chapter, "active efforts" means affirmative, active, thorough, and timely efforts intended primarily to maintain or reunite a child (b) In cases in which the Department of Family and Protective Services is involved in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship, the department's active efforts must involve assisting the parents through the steps of a case plan and with accessing or developing the resources necessary to satisfy the case plan. The department must tailor the active efforts to the facts and circumstances of each case, including by: (1) conducting a comprehensive assessment of the circumstances of the child's family, with a focus on safe reunification as the most desirable goal; (2) identifying appropriate services and helping the parents to overcome barriers, including actively assisting the parents in obtaining such services; (3) conducting or causing to be conducted a diligent search for the child's extended family members, and contacting and consulting with extended family members to provide family structure and support for the child and the child's parents; (4) taking steps to keep siblings together whenever (5) supporting regular visits with parents in the most natural setting possible as well as trial home visits of the child during any period of removal, consistent with the need to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of the child; (6) identifying community resources including housing, financial, transportation, mental health, substance abuse, and peer support services and actively assisting the child's parents or, when appropriate, the child's family, in using and (7) monitoring progress and participation in (8) considering alternative ways to address the needs of the child's parents and, where appropriate, the family, if the optimum services do not exist or are not available; and (9) providing post-reunification services and SECTION 4. Section 262.001(b), Family Code, is amended to (b) In determining the active [reasonable] efforts that are required to be made with respect to preventing or eliminating the need to remove a child from the child's home or to make it possible to return a child to the child's home, the child's health and safety SECTION 5. Section 262.101(a), Family Code, is amended to (a) An original suit filed by a governmental entity that requests permission to take possession of a child without prior notice and a hearing must be supported by an affidavit sworn to by a person with personal knowledge and stating facts sufficient to satisfy a person of ordinary prudence and caution that: (1) there is an immediate danger to the physical health or safety of the child or the child has been a victim of (2) continuation in the home would be contrary to the (3) there is no time, consistent with the physical health or safety of the child, for a full adversary hearing under (4) the child would not be adequately protected in the child's home with an order for the removal of the alleged perpetrator under Section 262.1015 or 262.1016 or a protective (5) placing the child with a relative or designated caregiver or with a caregiver under a parental child safety placement agreement authorized by Subchapter L, Chapter 264: (B) was not possible because there was no time, consistent with the physical health or safety of the child and the nature of the emergency, to conduct the caregiver evaluation; or (C) would pose an immediate danger to the physical health or safety of the child; and (6) active [reasonable] efforts, consistent with the circumstances and providing for the safety of the child, were made to prevent or eliminate the need for the removal of the child. SECTION 6. Section 262.101(b), Family Code, as amended by Chapters 672 (H.B. 968) and 675 (H.B. 1087), Acts of the 88th Legislature, Regular Session, 2023, is reenacted and amended to (b) The affidavit required by Subsection (a) must describe with specificity in a separate section all active [reasonable] efforts, consistent with the circumstances and providing for the safety of the child, that were made to prevent or eliminate the need SECTION 7. Sections 262.102(a) and (e), Family Code, are (a) Before a court may, without prior notice and a hearing, issue a temporary order for the conservatorship of a child under Section 105.001(a)(1) or a temporary restraining order or attachment of a child authorizing a governmental entity to take possession of a child in a suit brought by a governmental entity, (1) there is an immediate danger to the physical health or safety of the child or the child has been a victim of (2) continuation in the home would be contrary to the (3) there is no time, consistent with the physical health or safety of the child and the nature of the emergency, for a full adversary hearing under Subchapter C; (4) the child would not be adequately protected in the child's home with an order for the removal of the alleged perpetrator under Section 262.1015 or 262.1016 or a protective (5) placing the child with a relative or designated caregiver or with a caregiver under a parental child safety placement agreement authorized by Subchapter L, Chapter 264: (B) was not possible because there was no time, consistent with the physical health or safety of the child and the nature of the emergency, to conduct the caregiver evaluation; or (C) would pose an immediate danger to the physical health or safety of the child; and (6) active [reasonable] efforts, consistent with the circumstances and providing for the safety of the child, were made to prevent or eliminate the need for removal of the child. (e) The temporary order, temporary restraining order, or attachment of a child rendered by the court under Subsection (a) must describe with specificity in a separate section the active [reasonable] efforts, consistent with the circumstances and providing for the safety of the child, that were made to prevent or eliminate the need for the removal of the child as required by SECTION 8. Section 262.105(b), Family Code, is amended to (b) An original suit filed by a governmental entity after taking possession of a child under Section 262.104 must be supported by an affidavit stating facts sufficient to satisfy a person of ordinary prudence and caution that: (1) based on the affiant's personal knowledge or on information furnished by another person corroborated by the affiant's personal knowledge, one of the following circumstances existed at the time the child was taken into possession: (A) there was an immediate danger to the physical (B) the child was the victim of sexual abuse or of trafficking under Section 20A.02 or 20A.03, Penal Code; (C) the parent or person who had possession of the child was using a controlled substance as defined by Chapter 481, Health and Safety Code, and the use constituted an immediate danger to the physical health or safety of the child; or (D) the parent or person who had possession of the child permitted the child to remain on premises used for the manufacture of methamphetamine; and (2) based on the affiant's personal knowledge: (A) continuation of the child in the home would have been contrary to the child's welfare; (B) there was no time, consistent with the physical health or safety of the child, for a full adversary hearing (C) the child would not be adequately protected in the child's home with an order for the removal of the alleged perpetrator under Section 262.1015 or 262.1016 or a protective (D) placing the child with a relative or designated caregiver or with a caregiver under a parental child safety placement agreement authorized by Subchapter L, Chapter 264: (ii) was not possible because there was no time, consistent with the physical health or safety of the child and the nature of the emergency, to conduct the caregiver evaluation; (iii) would pose an immediate danger to the physical health or safety of the child; and (E) active [reasonable] efforts, consistent with the circumstances and providing for the safety of the child, were made to prevent or eliminate the need for the removal of the child. SECTION 9. Section 262.105(c), Family Code, as amended by Chapters 672 (H.B. 968) and 675 (H.B. 1087), Acts of the 88th Legislature, Regular Session, 2023, is reenacted and amended to (c) The affidavit required by Subsection (b) must describe with specificity in a separate section all active [reasonable] efforts, consistent with the circumstances and providing for the safety of the child, that were made to prevent or eliminate the need SECTION 10. Sections 262.107(a) and (c), Family Code, are (a) The court shall order the return of the child at the initial hearing regarding a child taken in possession without a court order by a governmental entity unless the court is satisfied (1) the evidence shows that one of the following (A) there is a continuing danger to the physical health or safety of the child if the child is returned to the parent, managing conservator, possessory conservator, guardian, caretaker, or custodian who is presently entitled to possession of (B) the child has been the victim of sexual abuse or of trafficking under Section 20A.02 or 20A.03, Penal Code, on one or more occasions and that there is a substantial risk that the child will be the victim of sexual abuse or of trafficking in the (C) the parent or person who has possession of the child is currently using a controlled substance as defined by Chapter 481, Health and Safety Code, and the use constitutes an immediate danger to the physical health or safety of the child; or (D) the parent or person who has possession of the child has permitted the child to remain on premises used for the manufacture of methamphetamine; (2) continuation of the child in the home would be contrary to the child's welfare; (3) the child would not be adequately protected in the child's home with an order for the removal of the alleged perpetrator under Section 262.1015 or 262.1016 or a protective (4) placing the child with a relative or designated caregiver or with a caregiver under a parental child safety placement agreement authorized by Subchapter L, Chapter 264: (B) was not possible because there was no time, consistent with the physical health or safety of the child and the nature of the emergency, to conduct the caregiver evaluation; or (C) would pose an immediate danger to the physical health or safety of the child; and (5) active [reasonable] efforts, consistent with the circumstances and providing for the safety of the child, were made to prevent or eliminate the need for removal of the child. (c) If the court does not order the return of the child at an initial hearing under Subsection (a), the court must describe in writing and in a separate section the active [reasonable] efforts, consistent with the circumstances and providing for the safety of the child, that were made to prevent or eliminate the need for the SECTION 11. Sections 262.201(g), (g-1), and (g-2), Family Code, are amended to read as follows: (g) In a suit filed under Section 262.101 or 262.105, at the conclusion of the full adversary hearing, the court shall order the return of the child to the parent, managing conservator, possessory conservator, guardian, caretaker, or custodian entitled to possession from whom the child is removed unless the court finds sufficient evidence to satisfy a person of ordinary prudence and (1) there was a danger to the physical health or safety of the child, including a danger that the child would be a victim of trafficking under Section 20A.02 or 20A.03, Penal Code, which was caused by an act or failure to act of the person entitled to possession and for the child to remain in the home is contrary to (2) the urgent need for protection required the immediate removal of the child and active [reasonable] efforts, consistent with the circumstances and providing for the safety of the child, were made to eliminate or prevent the child's removal; (3) active [reasonable] efforts have been made to enable the child to return home, but there is a substantial risk of a continuing danger if the child is returned home. (g-1) In a suit filed under Section 262.101 or 262.105, if the court does not order the return of the child under Subsection (g) and finds that another parent, managing conservator, possessory conservator, guardian, caretaker, or custodian entitled to possession did not cause the immediate danger to the physical health or safety of the child or was not the perpetrator of the neglect or abuse alleged in the suit, the court shall order possession of the child by that person unless the court finds sufficient evidence to satisfy a person of ordinary prudence and caution that, specific to each person entitled to possession: (1) the person cannot be located after the exercise of due diligence by the Department of Family and Protective Services, or the person is unable or unwilling to take possession of the (2) active [reasonable] efforts have been made to enable the person's possession of the child, but possession by that person presents a continuing danger to the physical health or safety of the child caused by an act or failure to act of the person, including a danger that the child would be a victim of trafficking under Section 20A.02 or 20A.03, Penal Code. (g-2) If, at the conclusion of a full adversary hearing, the court renders an order under Subsection (g) or (g-1), the court must describe in writing and in a separate section: (1) the active [reasonable] efforts that were made to enable the child to return home and the substantial risk of a continuing danger if the child is returned home, as required by (2) the active [reasonable] efforts that were made to enable a person's possession of the child and the continuing danger to the physical health or safety of the child as required by SECTION 12. Sections 262.2015(a), (c), and (d), Family Code, are amended to read as follows: (a) The court may waive the requirement of a service plan and the requirement to make active [reasonable] efforts to return the child to a parent and may accelerate the trial schedule to result in a final order for a child under the care of the Department of Family and Protective Services at an earlier date than provided by Subchapter D, Chapter 263, if the court finds that the parent has subjected the child to aggravated circumstances. (c) On finding that active [reasonable] efforts to make it possible for the child to safely return to the child's home are not required, the court shall at any time before the 30th day after the date of the finding, conduct an initial permanency hearing under Subchapter D, Chapter 263. Separate notice of the permanency plan is not required but may be given with a notice of a hearing under (d) The Department of Family and Protective Services shall make active [reasonable] efforts to finalize the permanent placement of a child for whom the court has made the finding described by Subsection (c). The court shall set the suit for trial on the merits as required by Subchapter D, Chapter 263, in order to facilitate final placement of the child. SECTION 13. Section 263.202(b), Family Code, is amended to (b) Except as otherwise provided by this subchapter, a status hearing shall be limited to matters related to the contents and execution of the service plan filed with the court. The court shall review the service plan that the department filed under this chapter for reasonableness, accuracy, and compliance with requirements of court orders and make findings as to whether: (1) a plan that has the goal of returning the child to the child's parents adequately ensures that active [reasonable] efforts are made to enable the child's parents to provide a safe (2) the child's parents have reviewed and understand the plan and have been advised that unless the parents are willing and able to provide the child with a safe environment, even with the assistance of a service plan, within the reasonable period of time specified in the plan, the parents' parental and custodial duties and rights may be subject to restriction or to termination under this code or the child may not be returned to the parents; (3) the plan is narrowly tailored to address any specific issues identified by the department; (4) the child's parents and the representative of the department have signed the plan; (5) based on the court's determination under Section 263.002, continued placement is appropriate if the child is placed in a residential treatment center; and (6) based on the court's determination under Section 263.00201, continued placement is appropriate if the child is placed in a qualified residential treatment program. SECTION 14. Section 263.306(a-1), Family Code, is amended (a-1) At each permanency hearing before a final order is (1) identify all persons and parties present at the (2) review the efforts of the department or other (A) locating and requesting service of citation on all persons entitled to service of citation under Section (B) obtaining the assistance of a parent in providing information necessary to locate an absent parent, alleged father, relative of the child, or other adult identified by the child as a potential relative or designated caregiver; (3) ask all parties present whether the child or the child's family has a Native American heritage and identify any Native American tribe with which the child may be associated; (4) review the extent of the parties' compliance with temporary orders and the service plan and the extent to which progress has been made toward alleviating or mitigating the causes necessitating the placement of the child in foster care; (5) review the permanency progress report to (A) the safety and well-being of the child and whether the child's needs, including any medical or special needs, are being adequately addressed; (B) the continuing necessity and appropriateness of the placement of the child, including with respect to a child who has been placed outside of this state, whether the placement continues to be in the best interest of the child; (C) the appropriateness of the primary and alternative permanency goals for the child developed in accordance with department rule and whether the department has made active [reasonable] efforts to finalize the permanency plan, including the concurrent permanency goals, in effect for the child; (D) whether the child has been provided the opportunity, in a developmentally appropriate manner, to express the child's opinion on any medical care provided; (E) whether the child has been provided the opportunity, in a developmentally appropriate manner, to identify any adults, particularly an adult residing in the child's community, who could be a relative or designated caregiver for the (F) for a child receiving psychotropic (i) has been provided appropriate nonpharmacological interventions, therapies, or strategies to meet (ii) has been seen by the prescribing physician, physician assistant, or advanced practice nurse at least (G) whether an education decision-maker for the child has been identified, the child's education needs and goals have been identified and addressed, and there have been major changes in the child's school performance or there have been (H) for a child 14 years of age or older, whether services that are needed to assist the child in transitioning from substitute care to independent living are available in the child's (I) for a child whose permanency goal is another planned permanent living arrangement: (i) the desired permanency outcome for the (ii) whether, as of the date of the hearing, another planned permanent living arrangement is the best permanency plan for the child and, if so, provide compelling reasons why it continues to not be in the best interest of the child to: (c) be placed with a legal guardian; (d) be placed with a fit and willing (iii) whether the department has conducted an independent living skills assessment under Section (iv) whether the department has addressed the goals identified in the child's permanency plan, including the child's housing plan, and the results of the independent living (v) if the youth is 16 years of age or older, whether there is evidence that the department has provided the youth with the documents and information listed in Section (vi) if the youth is 18 years of age or older or has had the disabilities of minority removed, whether there is evidence that the department has provided the youth with the documents and information listed in Section 264.121(e-1); (J) based on the court's determination under Section 263.002, whether continued placement is appropriate if the child is placed in a residential treatment center; and (K) based on the court's determination under Section 263.00201, whether continued placement is appropriate if the child is placed in a qualified residential treatment program; (6) determine whether to return the child to the child's parents if the child's parents are willing and able to provide the child with a safe environment and the return of the child is in the child's best interest; (7) estimate a likely date by which the child may be returned to and safely maintained in the child's home, placed for adoption, or placed in permanent managing conservatorship; and (8) announce in open court the dismissal date and the SECTION 15. Section 263.5031(a), Family Code, is amended to (a) At each permanency hearing after the court renders a (1) identify all persons and parties present at the (2) review the efforts of the department or other agency in notifying persons entitled to notice under Section (3) for a child placed with a relative of the child or other designated caregiver, review the efforts of the department to (A) the option to become verified by a licensed child-placing agency to operate an agency foster home, if (B) the permanency care assistance program under (4) review the permanency progress report to (A) the safety and well-being of the child and whether the child's needs, including any medical or special needs, are being adequately addressed; (B) whether the child has been provided the opportunity, in a developmentally appropriate manner, to identify any adult, particularly an adult residing in the child's community, who could be a relative or designated caregiver for the child; (C) whether the department placed the child with a relative or designated caregiver and the continuing necessity and appropriateness of the placement of the child, including with respect to a child who has been placed outside of this state, whether the placement continues to be in the best interest of the (D) if the child is placed in institutional care, whether efforts have been made to ensure that the child is placed in the least restrictive environment consistent with the child's best (E) the appropriateness of the primary and alternative permanency goals for the child, whether the department has made active [reasonable] efforts to finalize the permanency plan, including the concurrent permanency goals, in effect for the (i) the department has exercised due diligence in attempting to place the child for adoption if parental rights to the child have been terminated and the child is eligible (ii) another permanent placement, including appointing a relative as permanent managing conservator or returning the child to a parent, is appropriate for the child; (F) for a child whose permanency goal is another planned permanent living arrangement: (i) the desired permanency outcome for the (ii) whether, as of the date of the hearing, another planned permanent living arrangement is the best permanency plan for the child and, if so, provide compelling reasons why it continues to not be in the best interest of the child to: (c) be placed with a legal guardian; (d) be placed with a fit and willing (iii) whether the department has conducted an independent living skills assessment under Section (iv) whether the department has addressed the goals identified in the child's permanency plan, including the child's housing plan, and the results of the independent living (v) if the youth is 16 years of age or older, whether there is evidence that the department has provided the youth with the documents and information listed in Section (vi) if the youth is 18 years of age or older or has had the disabilities of minority removed, whether there is evidence that the department has provided the youth with the documents and information listed in Section 264.121(e-1); (G) if the child is 14 years of age or older, whether services that are needed to assist the child in transitioning from substitute care to independent living are available in the child's community; (H) whether the child is receiving appropriate medical care and has been provided the opportunity, in a developmentally appropriate manner, to express the child's opinion (I) for a child receiving psychotropic (i) has been provided appropriate nonpharmacological interventions, therapies, or strategies to meet (ii) has been seen by the prescribing physician, physician assistant, or advanced practice nurse at least (J) whether an education decision-maker for the child has been identified, the child's education needs and goals have been identified and addressed, and there are major changes in the child's school performance or there have been serious (K) for a child for whom the department has been named managing conservator in a final order that does not include termination of parental rights, whether to order the department to provide services to a parent for not more than six months after the date of the permanency hearing if: (i) the child has not been placed with a relative or other individual, including a foster parent, who is seeking permanent managing conservatorship of the child; and (ii) the court determines that further efforts at reunification with a parent are: (a) in the best interest of the child; (b) likely to result in the child's safe return to the child's parent; (L) whether the department has identified a family or other caring adult who has made a permanent commitment to (M) based on the court's determination under Section 263.002, whether continued placement is appropriate if the child is placed in a residential treatment center; and (N) based on the court's determination under Section 263.00201, whether continued placement is appropriate if the child is placed in a qualified residential treatment program. SECTION 16. Section 263.602(b), Family Code, is amended to (b) A court with extended jurisdiction over a young adult in extended foster care shall conduct extended foster care review hearings every six months for the purpose of reviewing and making (1) whether the young adult's living arrangement is safe and appropriate and whether the department has made active [reasonable] efforts to place the young adult in the least restrictive environment necessary to meet the young adult's needs; (2) whether the department is making active [reasonable] efforts to finalize the permanency plan that is in effect for the young adult, including a permanency plan for (3) whether, for a young adult whose permanency plan (A) the young adult participated in the development of the plan of service; (B) the young adult's plan of service reflects the independent living skills and appropriate services needed to achieve independence by the projected date; and (C) the young adult continues to make reasonable progress in developing the skills needed to achieve independence by (4) whether additional services that the department is authorized to provide are needed to meet the needs of the young SECTION 17. To the extent of any conflict, this Act prevails over another Act of the 89th Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, relating to nonsubstantive additions to and corrections in enacted SECTION 18. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.
Bill History
Bill filed: AN ACT relating to applying an active efforts standard for the removal of
Related Guides
Learn more about tracking Texas legislation and working with lobbyists.
How to Read & Track Texas Bills
Master bill numbering, understand legislative language, and learn effective tracking strategies.
Understanding Texas Legislative Deadlines
Navigate the 140-day session with critical calendar dates and filing deadlines.
How Laws Get Made in Texas
Follow a bill's journey from filing to the governor's desk through committees and floor votes.
When Should Your Business Hire a Lobbyist?
Discover the signs that your business needs professional advocacy at the Texas Capitol.